« Getting What You Paid For | Main | Growing Pains »
The Origin of Being Cool
There are not many times when a person such as myself is given the opportunity to pick the brain of someone as established as Al or Laura Ries, authors of Positioning (Al co-wrote with Jack Trout), The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding, The Fall of Advertising and the Rise of PR, and most recently, The Origin of Brands. This afternoon, however, I got to chat with Laura about their newest release (which has already become a favorite of mine), and how their theories can aid in saving not only the big brands of today, but also the start-up brands of tomorrow.
First, a little bit about Al and Laura Ries. The father/daughter duo run the Atlanta-based consulting firm Ries & Ries which touts a resume of clients such as Southwest Airlines, Burger King, Frito Lay, Pappa Johns, IBM, and Intel, just to name a few.
For more information on them, check out this. And, since we’re all blog-happy these days, check out Laura’s blog here.
For now, let’s jump in to what Laura had to say…
BJ: In The Origin of Brands, you give a list of the 10 most valuable brands (the list is included below). Of these 10 brands, which 2 are in the most trouble and why?
Laura Ries: Nokia. They have gone away from what made their brand so strong, cell phones. Now they have the N-Gage (the video game, MP3 playing, cell phone, all-in-one product) and other similar products. By doing this, they have missed out on many strong cell phone developments.
McDonald’s. They have been extending their menu for quite sometime now and with very little success. McDonald’s was made famous by making hamburgers. However, they now have over fifty items on their menu.
(Note: In The Origin of Brands, Al and Laura point out that the average McDonald’s unit in the US does $1.5 million in sales and the average In-N-Out Burger – which maintains a burgers-and-fries menu – does $1.9 million.)
The world’s ten most valuable brands and their estimated values, as determined by Interbrand, the leading brand valuation company (this list is given in greater detail in The Origin of Brands)
1. Coca-Cola ($70 billion)
2. Microsoft ($65 billion)
3. IBM ($52 billion)
4. General Electric ($42 billion)
5. Intel ($31 billion)
6. Nokia ($29 billion)
7. Disney ($28 billion)
8. McDonald’s ($25 billion)
9. Marlboro ($22 billion)
10. Mercedes-Benz ($21 billion)
BJ: In your opinion, what is the most overlooked skill that many entrepreneurs skip over when building a company?
Laura Ries: Trying to do too much. Many entrepreneurs have a lot of great ideas. That’s the problem. They should decide which one is the best one and focus all their efforts on that idea.
Also, all entrepreneurs need to spend a lot of their time and efforts on PR. They should work on their communication skills and their skills in dealing with the media. They need to become comfortable in dealing with the media. Every business needs a 3rd party endorsement whether that’s word of mouth, media coverage (i.e., PR), or advertising. However, advertising isn’t as credible as the others.
(Note: Al and Laura wrote an amazing book, which I mentioned above and have on my book lists called The Fall of Advertising and the Rise of PR. This book is a great tool for any entrepreneur.)
BJ: In The Origin of Brands, you discuss the differences between convergence (where industries merge) and divergence (industries branch off to create new categories and becoming the first in the new category). If a company already exists and then learns about the theory of divergence, what should they then do now, since they do not have the luxury of becoming the first in a new category?
Laura Ries: Aim at becoming a strong #2. Many companies have done this with some great success. Pepsi vs. Coke, Target vs. Walmart, Lowes vs. Home Depot.
However, you can’t be a carbon copy of the industry leader. You have to be opposite of the leader and attack the difference (Pepsi aimed at being the choice of a new generation, suggesting that Coke is for old people; Target aimed at becoming cheap chic, etc.).
Or you can simply tweak the category. The point of divergence doesn’t have to be a revolutionary difference. It could be something like locations or operations based.
BJ: OK, Laura, what if an entrepreneur comes up with a great idea to become the first in a new category and then learns the idea is already in action elsewhere?
Laura Ries: Being first doesn’t always mean actually being the first to do something. It’s more important to become the first in the mind of the consumer for that category. So even though some other company is doing what you want to do, they may not yet hold the position in the mind of the consumer for that specific category.
(Another Note: Al wrote the cult classic book called Positioning, which he co-wrote with Jack Trout in 1980. This book was based on a psychological positioning that each product has in the mind of the consumer. The best way to hold a psychological position is to be the first in the category and, therefore, the first in the mind of the consumer. I highly recommend this book!)
BJ: OK, Laura, last but not least, give me your top 3 books you would recommend to anyone who’s starting up a company, excluding your own books.
Laura Ries:
Purple Cow: Transform Your Business by Being Remarkable, by Seth Godin
The Anatomy of Buzz: How to Create Word-Of-Mouth Marketing, by Emanuel Rosen
The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference, by Malcolm Gladwell
July 12, 2004 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/915463
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Origin of Being Cool:
» On being #2 from What's Your Brand Mantra?
BJ Olin interviews Laura Reis, co-author of The Origin of Brands. Check it out! Here's a great snip: BJ: In Origin of Brands, you discuss the differences between convergence (where industries merge) and divergence (industries branch off to create new [Read More]
Tracked on Jul 14, 2004 11:33:57 AM
» Ries and Trout from Marketing Playbook
I remember the first time I read Positioning, really made clear so many of the core challenges of marketers. Well, Ries (and Ries) and Trout still at it. Al and Laurie Ries' have a new book, The Origin of Brands.... [Read More]
Tracked on Jul 19, 2004 11:21:43 PM
» Another author blogs from 800CEOREAD Blog
Laura Ries has started a blog. It is titled The Origin of Brands Blog to go with the new book. It has been going for a couple of weeks. You can also read another Q&A about The Origin of Brands... [Read More]
Tracked on Jul 20, 2004 12:24:51 PM
» Another author blogs from 800CEOREAD Blog
Laura Ries has started a blog. It is titled The Origin of Brands Blog to go with the new book. It has been going for a couple of weeks. You can also read another Q&A about The Origin of Brands... [Read More]
Tracked on Jul 20, 2004 5:16:07 PM
Comments
BJ, Great interview. The idea of settling for a "Strong Second" seems to be strategy of choice for alot of larger companies. It definitely goes contrary to the belief that some entreprenuers hold: enter the market and be number 1, no matter what.
Posted by: Travis McMenimon | Jul 12, 2004 11:23:37 AM
Travis -
Thanks. It's one of those things that you just have to weigh out as far as strategy is concerned. And it's probably tougher than it sounds. But I think you're right when you say that many entreprenuers attempt to be #1 in a market or segment no matter what. This is mainly because we tend to dream big... which is great, but many times we have a difficult time knowing when to aim slightly lower, for reality's sake. Dreaming big is very important, but doing so with balance is key.
Being a strong #2 is sometimes just a crucial. Every #1 needs a #2. The best #2 ever? Avis. They used their market status as a way to exploit and reposition #1. They claimed that they tried harder because they were #2. Brilliant.
Thanks again Travis.
Posted by: BJ | Jul 12, 2004 12:10:03 PM
Great interview, BJ. You have a knack for getting the ear of well known biz peeps and authors, so I hope you can continue with the interviews. Great stuff.
Posted by: Scott Miller | Jul 12, 2004 5:19:46 PM
Just the one comment by Laura (about entrepreneurs and having too many ideas) describes me to a T.
Over the years, I have tried to do too much...and what remains on my hard drives for months on end are unfinished products. Some are almost there. Others, in terms of actual work, have only just started. Now I'm focusing on few things:-
1. My volunteer work (and the 3D graphics related work).
2. Finishing two levels, each of them meant for a different game - and releasing them to the public.
3. Making simple models for the Wirehead Studios production Sliders.
4. Preparing a resumé and then targeting a certain company, of whom I've been active on their forums and give Mr. Shabadoh himself headaches with my badly placed forum threads. Mwahahaha!!!
Anyways, fantastic interview...I think I'll be coming here more often. Now you've just got to wonder "Scott...what have you gotten me into?!" :P (wink wink nudge nudge)
Regards,
Yickle.
Posted by: YicklePigeon | Jul 13, 2004 3:55:45 AM
It is interesting that Yickle comments about herself (and I would propose all entrepreneurs) have vast amounts of ideas, because I found myself thinking the same thing when reading the interview. However, I would argue that entrepreneurs have to have tons of ideas, and more importantly, the drive and passion to make those ideas a reality in their businesses. It is a harsh reality that in the beginning it is hard to do everything because you are everything to your business be it as CEO, CFO, COO or Chief Trash Remover, etc. I think you get my drift.
BJ, when you bought Cilantros did it have a loyal customer base? Since you bought it just over a year ago, what have your primary goals been? I would be willing to bet that creating a strong brand for the company to open a second store was high on your list.
I ask because although I am still in college. I am trying to figure out what I want to do with an opportunity to buy a family business from my father. It is a locksmith with one location, 10 employees 5 of which are on the road as mobile locksmiths (they service all of eastern Massachusetts).
Now that you know part of my story, I would be interested to know what your goals are due to some simillar situational conditions (obviously not the business). I have some operational changes that I think need to be made as well as some strategic, but I am intrigued by this branding concept and I wonder if it will work in this business.
Posted by: Travis McMenimon | Jul 13, 2004 10:08:39 AM
Having a lot of ideas isn't always a bad thing. In fact, I think it's very healthy, especially for people such as us, to push ourselves to have numerous ideas... to keep our mind going at all times and to constantly be looking at other businesses and industries. This makes us stronger, faster, and more effective on our own companies and lives.
Laura makes a compelling point, though. It's easy to allow yourself to act on numerous ideas and not just focusing on one. The fact of the matter is, while it may seem like a good idea, that spreading yourself too thin will end up killing ALL of your ideas, no matter how good they are. However, I think this applies more to the younger entrepreneur. I think that the further along in life you get, the more you'll be able to handle... much like riding a bike. It's wise to focus on just one idea in the beginning at first... but if it's your 5th company, and the previous 4 have been successful, then perhaps you might be able to handle 2 (if you're a good delegator).
Travis -
To answer your question, yes, Cilantro's did have a very loyal customer base when I took over. In fact, I was part of that base! My wife and I ate there probably 3 times/week. That said, I actually went into the acquisition of the company with the intent on expanding. That was my goal from the start. However, my situation presented a different problem. The original unit (though extremely successful and built soley on word of mouth) was in a horrible location, very small, and only open for lunch. So, in order to prove the concept to the next level, I had to build what would become a closer prototype of what we would want. Bigger, open longer, and in a high-traffic, upscale center.
There were, like you said, some operational things that I wanted to change. Some worked, some didn't. We did, however, expand to the 2nd unit and did so with no conventional advertising.
The branding thing is tricky. It's a philosophy issue that many people can't seem to agree on. In fact, it's almost as dangerous as discussing religion or politics! However, the branding concepts of Team Ries is the one I attach to the most, cause it makes sense to me.
I think, however, that it is not limited to certain industries and can work for a locksmith operation. The tough question is... HOW? And the answer is... this is where you come in (if you choose to do so!). But no matter what you do, if it's starting a business or buying one, ALWAYS have an exit plan. This will dictate most of your decisions. Hope that helps!
Posted by: BJ | Jul 13, 2004 11:53:07 AM
A really good interview BJ. I like the idea of a strong second and like Travis said it really seems to be the choice of the bigger companies. I think Apple loves being #2 in the personal computer market because it helps their business when they are mentioned as "the other computer company".
Posted by: Stephan Segraves | Jul 13, 2004 2:12:25 PM
Stephan -
I don't know if I see Apple as a #2 per se. I see where you see that, though. Apple, however, is such a great example of brand divergence. They have set themselves apart from other PCs by creating their own category. Not to mention iTunes, which just announced that it has sold over 100,000,000 songs, and iPod, which will continue to dominate the MP3 market. But as a Mac owner (Powerbook G4), I can tell you that it's an emotional cult-like attachment. When I see other people at Starbucks with a powerbook, there's this bond I feel... not only that we both spent a lot of money on a computer, but that that person appreciates what I view as the "finer things".
Apple continues to be a great brand by building asthetically-pleasing products and is well-known for being the nonWindows-based OS, which use to be a huge segregating issue with users, but now things are becoming more and more compatible between the two.
But as far as their OS, they're definitely #2 behind Windows.
Posted by: BJ | Jul 13, 2004 3:16:39 PM
Apple's problem is that Microsoft has a legal standards monopoly with Windows, and Apple -- bless their hearts -- has zero chance. In mature categories that have equal-chance competitors, more typically 2-3 brands take 90 to 95% of the entire pie for the category.
Once a category leader is established, it's practically impossible to overtake that leader, unless that leader self-destructs, or market conditions shift significantly.
This is maybe the biggest issue facing Cilantro's: How to overcome Chipotle's early lead. The answer is to let Chipotle own their category, and to find a new, compelling category for Cilantro's to own. But coming up with such a new category is not always easy.
Posted by: Scott Miller | Jul 13, 2004 6:08:05 PM
Everyone at my job uses a Mac except for me so I completely understand the cult following culture. I am thinking of getting a 15" Powerbook myself (being the Linux geek that I am).
Windows is slowly losing ground. Since the State Department released a statement saying that Internet Explorer was a security risk to the people of the U.S. and recent moves by Dell to give the option of installing Linux by default (and supporting it) and now there are talks between Apple and Sun to completely get rid of Microsoft Office (which has always been a thorn) from OS X and replace it with OpenOffice.
To me Apple comes off as an innovative company that likes being innovative and don't mind not being the most popular on the block. I think that is part of their strategy, to not be mainstream. Half of the innovations in computers that we see today are somewhat related to Apple in some shape or form. Bill Gates owes his whole livelihood to the fact that he is an amazing business man and Steve Jobs.
Posted by: Stephan Segraves | Jul 13, 2004 10:58:40 PM
Just a quick note before I vamoose and find myself work.
Those of us who appreciate the very brief but varied history of computing in general, might like to go to http://www.archive.org and head to the Moving Images section to download Computer Chronicles. Most of y'all who live in the US should remember it's run of around 20 years.
The most interesting episode I've downloaded thus far, is a 1985 edition featuring Sargon 3 for the Apple and the Ghostbusters game.
Also, I'm a big fan of OpenOffice. Especially because it's free and (to me) easier to use.
Finally, just to correct Travis up there, I'm male! Although I'll take it as a compliment seeing as...well...currently to me I look a size 10, flat chested - although by the time I'm 50 that'll change I'm sure...and I have long hair...almost.
Regards,
Yickle.
Posted by: YicklePigeon | Jul 14, 2004 2:58:38 AM
Yickle, my apologies!
Travis
Posted by: Travis McMenimon | Jul 14, 2004 8:24:22 AM
Lol tis ok :}
I've been called *alot* worse :D *wink*
In any case, I think I'll go back downstairs soon and sit in my new bike.
Regards,
Yickle.
Posted by: YicklePigeon | Jul 14, 2004 12:51:25 PM
BJ - what do you mean about exit? This seems a little obvious to me. If your business does well you will exit by selling it or if your business fails the business will exit you! Of course, there are derviatives of the above like a partial sale or retiring to the beach and letting management run the business. But like I said, its sort of obvious......isn't it? Or am I missing something?
Posted by: Lilian Tsing Li | Jul 17, 2004 1:16:35 PM
Lilian -
Exiting planning and strategies aren't (or shouldn't be) as simple as selling or failing.
Most of this is strategic planning in the beginning. If you want to sell the company, then when? For how much? What will you need to do in growth and expansion to sell it when you want and for how much you want?
When you sell, how will you sell? Asset sale? Stock sale? How will you shelter your earnings from the sell from taxes?
Most of these can be answered with some planning and foresight. Also, you can plan exits with the thought of the company failing. A good lawyer and CPA will help with all of these tremendously.
Hope that helps!
BJ
Posted by: BJ | Jul 17, 2004 10:58:48 PM